I found a bag with a Gucci tag at a thrift store – it’s 100% real but people say ‘bless your heart’ when they see it

AN avid saver shared her delight at discovering her purchase had a designer label.

The shopper showed off her fashion find online, but Reddit users weren’t buying the item’s value.

In it publishReddit user El-In-Hell gave readers an up-close look at the exchange.

She revealed that she paid $8 for the light pink bag with black buttons.

On the front of the bag, a small tag indicated that the item was from Gucci.

She also gave a peek inside the seemingly designer purchase, including photos of the floral lining and care label.

The Reddit user said she is “pretty sure it’s real” and shared her excitement about the idea.

“[I’m] kind of going crazy with luck,” the saver told her followers.

However, most social media users did not share their enthusiasm for the product.

Redditors shared their speculations about the exchange in the comments section.

“Bless you,” wrote one reader, who was not so impressed with the purchase.

“It’s a draw to buy beauty products, it’s not a bag. Sorry,” said another person.

“Are you freaking out over a cosmetic bag that probably came with perfume?” asked another Reddit user.

Others pointed out that the bag might not even be worth the $8 price tag.

“Although authentic, [it’s] It’s still worth less than what you paid for it,” one person wrote.

“It’s not even made by Gucci, it’s made by the perfume company,” said another reader.

“Designers rarely make their own cosmetic bags! Most of ALL cosmetic bags are made in China!” commented a Reddit user.

MIXED REACTIONS

Some social media users viewed the situation more positively, suggesting several uses for the bag.

One person suggested that the poster use the item “for their tampons.”

“It would make a mean makeup bag,” wrote another reader.

“Real or not, worth a lot or not, it’s adorable,” one Redditor pointed out.

“Still, nice find! I liked the look, it’s not too flashy, but it still has a cool floral print inside,” commented another person.

3

3