Supreme Court appears ready to allow emergency abortions in Idaho for now, Bloomberg report says

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on telegram
Share on email
Share on reddit
Share on whatsapp
Share on telegram


WASHINGTON – WASHINGTON (AP) – The Supreme Court appears prepared to allow emergency abortions in Idaho when a pregnant patient’s health is at serious risk as a legal case unfolds, according to Bloomberg News, which said a copy of the opinion was briefly posted Wednesday on the court’s website.

O document suggests the court will decide it should not have gotten involved in the case so quickly and, by a 6-3 vote, will reinstate a lower court order that allowed state hospitals to perform emergency abortions to protect the health of a pregnant patient, Bloomberg he said.

Such an outcome would leave the central questions of the case unresolved, and Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in concurrence that it leaves key questions unanswered.

“Today’s decision is not a victory for pregnant patients in Idaho. It’s a delay,” she wrote.

The Supreme Court acknowledged that a document was inadvertently posted on Wednesday. That document was quickly removed.

“The Court’s Publications Unit inadvertently and briefly uploaded a document to the Court’s website. The Court’s opinion in Moyle v. United States and Idaho v. United States will be issued in due course,” court spokeswoman Patricia McCabe said in a statement.

Conservative justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch are listed as dissents from the decision, which would allow the case to continue in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court.

The conclusion may not be the court’s final decision because the judges’ decision has not been officially released.

The Biden administration has sued Idaho, arguing that hospitals must provide abortions to stabilize pregnant patients in rare emergency cases when their health is at serious risk.

Most Republican-controlled states began enforcing restrictions after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. two years ago. Idaho is among 14 states that prohibit abortion at all stages of pregnancy, with very limited exceptions. Idaho argued that its ban allows abortion to save a pregnant patient’s life and that federal law does not require expanding exceptions.

The briefly released ruling would reverse the Supreme Court’s previous order that allowed Idaho’s law to take effect even in medical emergencies while the case unfolds. Since then, several women have required medical air transport out of state in cases where abortion is routine treatment to prevent infections, bleeding and other serious health risks, Idaho doctors said.

The Supreme Court’s eventual ruling could have cascading effects on emergency care in other states with strict abortion bans. Reports of pregnant women being moved away from U.S. emergency rooms increased following the 2022 Supreme Court decision that struck down the constitutional right to abortion, according to federal documents obtained by the Associated Press.

The Justice Department’s lawsuit is subject to a federal law that requires hospitals that accept Medicare to provide stabilizing care regardless of a patient’s ability to pay. The law is the Emergency Medical Treatment and Employment Act, or EMTALA.

Nearly all hospitals accept Medicare, so emergency room doctors in Idaho and other states with bans would have to perform abortions if necessary to stabilize a pregnant patient and avoid serious health risks such as loss of reproductive organs, he argued. the Department of Justice.

Idaho argued that the exception for a patient’s life covers serious health circumstances and that the Biden administration misinterpreted the law to circumvent the state ban and expand access to abortion.

Doctors said the Idaho law made them afraid to perform abortions, even when a pregnancy seriously endangers the patient’s health. The law requires that anyone convicted of having an abortion be imprisoned for at least two years.

A federal judge initially sided with the Democratic administration and ruled that abortion was legal in medical emergencies. After the state appealed, the Supreme Court allowed the law to take full effect in January.

___

Follow AP’s coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.



This story originally appeared on ABCNews.go.com read the full story

Support fearless, independent journalism

We are not owned by a billionaire or shareholders – our readers support us. Donate any amount over $2. BNC Global Media Group is a global news organization that delivers fearless investigative journalism to discerning readers like you! Help us to continue publishing daily.

Support us just once

We accept support of any size, at any time – you name it for $2 or more.

Related

More

1 2 3 6,089

Don't Miss

Kelsea Ballerini leaks personal text from singer Noah Kahan asking to collaborate on a ‘real duet’ as fans cry

COUNTRY star Kelsea Ballerini has released text messages between her

HS FOOTBALL: Gumble and Kalitsnik lead the all-star cast of the 90th Dream Game

The Players of the Year and two traditional championship programs