Politics

Senate Sinks Competing IVF Bills: How Do They Differ?

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on telegram
Share on email
Share on reddit
Share on whatsapp
Share on telegram



Two Senate bills from different sides of the aisle that aimed to protect access to in vitro fertilization (IVF) were rejected this week amid bipartisan wrangling.

The Right to IVF Act – sponsored by Democratic Senators Tammy Duckworth (Ill.), Patty Murray (Wash.), and Cory Booker (NJ) – and the IVF Protection Act – sponsored by Republican Senators Katie Britt (Ala.) and Ted Cruz (Texas) – were shot down this week along party lines.

Democrats blocked a unanimous request from Republicans on Wednesday, arguing that the GOP bill did not go far enough to guarantee access to in vitro fertilization. Murray called the legislation “a public relations tool, pure and simple.”

“If Democrats allowed the IVF Protection Act to pass today, they would lose an important scare tactic they believe will help them in November,” Britt said after the vote.

Republicans returned the favor on Thursday, blocking the Democrats’ bill from advancing. GOP senators criticized the vote as an election-year stunt and raised concerns about unfunded mandates as well as the potential impact on religious freedom.

President Biden criticized the vote, saying in a statement Thursday: “Once again, Senate Republicans have refused to protect access to fertility treatments for women desperately trying to get pregnant.”

Although these bills were drafted with the same intentions on the surface, there are important differences.

The Republican IVF Protection Act would prevent states from receiving Medicaid funding if they implement a ban on IVF. Democrats argue that this bill encourages far-right Republican lawmakers to defund Medicaid and ban IVF at the same time.

It also does not explicitly guarantee the right to IVF services.

“Nothing in the IVF Protection Act shall be construed to oblige any individual or organization to provide IVF services,” the legislation says.

While the bill calls on states not to pass IVF bans, it would not prevent courts from restricting access to the service. It would also have allowed restrictions on how embryos are stored, implanted and disposed of.

The Democrats’ version is more comprehensive, being a collection of four bills that would establish a national right to in vitro fertilization services and other assisted reproductive technologies.

The bill would establish a patient’s right to receive fertility treatment from a health care provider; continue or complete ongoing fertility treatment previously initiated by a healthcare provider; make decisions about what happens to reproductive genetic material; and establish contracts regarding the handling, testing, storage, shipping and disposal of genetic material by a supplier.

Fertility treatments and counseling would be added to Title 38 of the U.S. Code, which outlines Veterans Benefits. State Medicaid plans would also be required to provide assistance for fertility treatments.



This story originally appeared on thehill.com read the full story

Support fearless, independent journalism

We are not owned by a billionaire or shareholders – our readers support us. Donate any amount over $2. BNC Global Media Group is a global news organization that delivers fearless investigative journalism to discerning readers like you! Help us to continue publishing daily.

Support us just once

We accept support of any size, at any time – you name it for $2 or more.

Related

More

Senate Democrat: Time to support Biden

July 8, 2024
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D), who represents the key swing state of Nevada, on Monday urged her colleagues and fellow Democrats to unite behind President Biden despite growing

How to Negotiate Lower Bills

June 28, 2024
AAfter having a baby in August 2020, Loren Jerae and her partner realized that quitting their jobs to stay home with the baby would be more affordable than
1 2 3 6,300

Don't Miss