Royals

Prince Harry LOSES first attempt to challenge decision on removal of publicly funded security

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on telegram
Share on email
Share on reddit
Share on whatsapp
Share on telegram


PRINCE Harry today lost the first round of his legal bid to challenge the decision to remove his publicly funded security.

The Duke of Sussex’s 24-hour royal protection has been downgraded following Megxit.

two

Harry is trying to appeal the decision

Harry vowed to appeal the ruling but fell at the first hurdle in his legal bid today after being blocked from challenging it.

However, he can directly ask the Court of Appeal for the green light to challenge Sir Peter’s decision.

Harry launched proceedings against the Home Office and the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royals and Public Figures (Ravec) after being stripped of his protection.

He tried to sue the Home Office because it refused to spend taxpayers’ money money into bodyguards after he left the Royal Family.

Harry also wanted to fund his own armed Metropolitan Police bodyguards, but the authorities refused – with sources insisting the officers are not “guns for hire”.

He complained that he could not return to the UK with Meghan, Archie and Lilibet “because it is too dangerous” as a result of his security being downgraded.

His lawyers also claimed his treatment was “unlawful and unfair” and warned of “the impact on the UK’s reputation of a successful attack” on the duke.

But Ravec argued that allowing Harry to pay for his own protective security would be contrary to the public interest and undermine public confidence in the Metropolitan Police.

A judge ruled in February that there was no “illegality” in the call to remove Harry’s security.

The duke has security when staying at royal residences or attending royal events, but has to fend for himself if he wants to see friends while in Britain.

Major update in Prince Harry’s ‘drug use’ case as Duke’s US visa documents are handed over to judge

High Court judge Sir Peter Lane ruled in February that these conditions were fair and would continue.

He said Harry’s lawyers had adopted “an inappropriate and formalistic interpretation of the Ravec process.”

The judge added: “The ‘tailored’ process devised for the applicant in the decision of 28 February 2020 was, and is, legally sound.”

Harry and Meghan lost their protection when they left the UK

two

Harry and Meghan lost their protection when they left the UKCredit: Getty



This story originally appeared on The-sun.com read the full story

Support fearless, independent journalism

We are not owned by a billionaire or shareholders – our readers support us. Donate any amount over $2. BNC Global Media Group is a global news organization that delivers fearless investigative journalism to discerning readers like you! Help us to continue publishing daily.

Support us just once

We accept support of any size, at any time – you name it for $2 or more.

Related

More

1 2 3 9,595

Don't Miss