As SEC spring meetings begin, big questions emerge surrounding the House agreement

For the first time in a few years, scheduling will not take center stage when the powers of the SEC converge in Miramar Beach, Florida.

No, long-term scheduling has not yet been decided. We don’t know if the SEC will play eight or nine conference games in a few years. That will have to be resolved, but much bigger issues and questions arise as the SEC spring meetings begin this week.

A new era of revenue sharing has arrived that officially crushes the notion of amateurism in college sports. The NCAA, SEC, Big Ten, Big 12, ACC and Pac-12 voted in favor of a deal in the case House v. NCAA last week.

Football and basketball coaches, athletics directors, university presidents and more will make the annual trip to the Emerald Coast with plenty to discuss at the SEC spring meetings.

The settlement is historic and noteworthy for its payment of compensation for back injuries and what it means for athletes’ compensation in the future. The NCAA’s back damages, paid to former athletes who were not allowed to profit from their name, image and likeness, will total about $2.8 billion over 10 years, according to a summary of the proposed terms obtained by USA TODAY Sports. Much of this is expected to be paid for with distributions the NCAA would have given to member schools.

And as part of the terms of the agreement, the schools will share revenue with the athletes in the future.

MORE: Relive Nick Saban’s epic Alabama football coaching career with our special book!

KALEN DEBOER: Who is Kalen DeBoer? A collection of stories about Alabama’s new football coach

“The five conferences of autonomy and the NCAA’s agreement to the terms of the agreement are an important step in the ongoing reform of college sports that will provide benefits to student-athletes and provide clarity in college athletics across all divisions for years to come,” read a joint statement. from all power conferences and the NCAA. “This agreement is also a roadmap for college sports leaders and Congress to ensure this uniquely American institution can continue to provide unparalleled opportunities for millions of students. All of Division I has made today’s progress possible, and we all have work to do to implement the terms of the agreement as the legal process continues. We look forward to working with our various student-athlete leadership groups to write the next chapter for college sports.”

The beginning of this writing has already begun and will only expand in Florida during the meetings. Frankly, the timing of the meeting is perfect on the heels of the historic deal decision. Coaches and administrators will all be in the same location and will have the opportunity to better figure out how to handle issues that arise.

Here are some of the biggest:

How will revenue be divided among current athletes after the Chamber’s agreement?

Schools will now have the ability to share a certain amount of revenue with athletes each year starting in 2025. That number is expected to be at least $20 million to start, according to USA TODAY Sports.

How is this distributed among athletes? This is perhaps the biggest question. Especially since Title IX is still expected to be enforced, according to Yahoo! Sports. So it will take some strategic calculations for schools as they piece together the $20 million-plus puzzle.

What will future lineups look like?

As part of the terms of the agreement, roster limits are expected to go into effect instead of scholarship limits. What that looks like and how the coaches manage this new challenge will be something worth following for the first few seasons once the terms of the deal come into effect.

What will the future of NIL be like?

Revenue sharing is not seen as the limit to what athletes can earn. It’s essentially a baseline. Athletes will still have the chance to benefit and earn money from their name, image and likeness under the terms of the proposed agreement.

So what does this mean for the future of NIL in college athletics? Or another way to say it: what does this mean for the future of the pay-for-play model that replaced the true NIL?

As a result of the agreement, the application of pay-for-play becomes another possibility. But how will this be applied? What is this application like? And how will the “true NIL” be determined?

There are many unknowns, but there is at least one certainty: the SEC spring meetings couldn’t have come at a better time.

Nick Kelly is the Alabama writer for The Tuscaloosa News, part of the USA TODAY Network, and covers Alabama football and men’s basketball. Contact him at nkelly@gannett.com or follow him @_NickKelly on X, the social media app formerly known as Twitter.

This article originally appeared on The Tuscaloosa News: SEC Spring Meetings: Questions Emerge Around Chamber Agreement