Tech

Musk misses Australian court hearing over Sydney knife attack posts

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on telegram
Share on email
Share on reddit
Share on whatsapp
Share on telegram


(Bloomberg) — Elon Musk’s social network X received an injunction from an Australian court to remove images of a knife attack, sparking a furious response from the owner who accused the government of censorship.

Bloomberg’s Most Read

At a hearing on Monday night in Sydney, the Federal Court of Australia ordered X to withhold all recordings of a terrorist attack at a church in the city on April 15 until Wednesday. The court will then convene a second hearing at a later date to determine the validity of the eSafety Commissioner’s removal notice.

In response to the decision, Musk posted an image suggesting that X was the only social media site that defended free speech, while also saying that the Australian government did not have the right to censor content in other countries.

“Our concern is that if any country is allowed to censor content for all countries, which is what the Australian ‘E-Security Commissioner’ is demanding, then what is to stop any one country from controlling the entire Internet?” Musk said in a post to X on Monday night.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said no one was above the law and branded the tech entrepreneur “arrogant” and out of touch.

“This is a guy who chose ego and shows violence over common sense. I think Australians will shake their heads when they think this billionaire is prepared to go to court fighting for the right to sow division and show violent videos that are very distressing,” Albanese said in an interview with Sky News on Tuesday.

Australia’s eSafety Commissioner has ordered social media companies including X and Meta Platforms Inc. – operator of Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram – to remove graphic videos showing the stabbing of a bishop in a Sydney church last week. However, while some agreed, an X spokesperson said in a public statement that the commissioner “does not have the authority to dictate what content X users can view globally.”

The refusal sparked a furious backlash from Australian lawmakers and renewed calls for broader restrictions aimed at social media companies, including anti-misinformation laws flagged by the Australian government last year.

Bloomberg Businessweek Most Read

©2024 Bloomberg LP



Source link

Support fearless, independent journalism

We are not owned by a billionaire or shareholders – our readers support us. Donate any amount over $2. BNC Global Media Group is a global news organization that delivers fearless investigative journalism to discerning readers like you! Help us to continue publishing daily.

Support us just once

We accept support of any size, at any time – you name it for $2 or more.

Related

More

1 2 3 6,300

Don't Miss

Rabbit denies claims that its R1 virtual assistant is a glorified Android app

Rabbit denies claims that its R1 virtual assistant is a glorified Android app

O Rabbit R1a pocket-sized AI virtual assistant device, runs Android
Trump encourages Johnson in ‘stimulating meeting’ with Republican Party

Trump encourages Johnson in ‘stimulating meeting’ with Republican Party

Shares of House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) appear to have